A variant of the QAnon movement has been launched in Britain. Much of their stuff has been on the Internet over here for several years, however, this has now gone through a significant rebranding exercise. Until now it has largely been an Internet movement, but it now appears to be morphing into a street movement as several protests have been announced recently. It is specifically centring on the issue of child protection and anti-paedophilia. Those who opposed the English Defence League will remember how obsessed they were with Paedophilia when they felt it could be linked to Muslims. Similarly, QAnon is similarly focused and their belief system is oriented around blaming it on the left and liberals. It will come as no surprise to find that many of the same people involved in EDL are involved in this project. This is aligning with the anti-vax and the anti-mask protests which are also a feature of QAnon.
Dr. Amy Cohen, executive director of Every Last One, explained to me in an interview that under the Trump administration’s so-called “Remain in Mexico” program, “the United States has been essentially feeding vulnerable migrant children and families to cartel traffickers in Mexico continuously.” The program, officially known by the Orwellian-sounding title of “Migrant Protection Protocols” (MPP), sends immigrants seeking entry into the United States across the border to Mexico to await the adjudication of their cases. While the Department of Homeland Security claimed that MPP would “decrease the… ability of smugglers and traffickers to prey on vulnerable populations,” in fact it does the opposite.
Cohen elaborated on this horrific phenomenon, saying, “migrants are dropped off with nothing on the other side of the border, with no shelter, with no protection, with no food, with no money. And within minutes, they are picked up by cartel gangs that are waiting.” As a child and family psychiatrist who works closely with traumatized migrant children, she did not mince words, saying that families are, “kidnapped and used for extortion, which is a form of trafficking. Sometimes they are tortured. Sometimes they are raped. Children are compelled to watch. Sometimes children themselves are raped.”
How QAnon spreads alarm.
The reality is that one abused and murdered child is one too many. However, QAnon wants to portray a nightmarish world, which forces many working in child welfare to react to their manufactured panics rather than doing their jobs of protecting children.
As HuffPost reported.
Polaris, which runs the national human trafficking hotline, warned in July that unsubstantiated claims “can spin out of control and mislead well-meaning people into doing more harm than good.” In August, after the century-old charity Save the Children issued a public statement to distance itself from QAnon’s leeched “Save Our Children” front, the nonprofit World Without Exploitationfollowed suit, casting QAnon promoters as “grifters with a hero complex.” Days later, KidSafe Foundation denounced them as “parasites” who threaten to “tarnish our reputations and harm our good works.”
But QAnon is notorious for launching mob harassment campaigns against its perceived adversaries, and other anti-trafficking groups — having already witnessed or experienced such abuse — have declined to speak out against it.
The potential risk of publicly condemning QAnon and provoking its fury versus the harm of letting its conspiracy theories proliferate unchallenged is the subject of discussions playing out inside child welfare organizations across the country. Severalemployees who spoke to HuffPost declined to comment on the record for fear of triggering a backlash.
“We have had conversations internally about [QAnon], and just threading the needle on trying not to anger a very mobilized group,” said a senior employee at another human rights organization headquartered in Washington.
In Britain, it seems they have not used the SavetheChildren tag for fear of litigation from a respected charity, and are using SaveourChildren.
They are still using alarmism to fuel their base. They frequently point out that 118,000 children go missing every year.
That number is reported as missing, but it does not mean they stay missing.
To fire up their base they need to construct a scenario of a Gulag Archipelago of abducted victims across Britain.
Full Fact reports:
Generally, most missing children incidents are resolved quickly without harm to the child being recorded. In 98% of recorded incidents involving missing children in England and Wales, no harm was recorded, although police data does caveat this by saying that this just means cases have been closed without harm being reported by the missing child. The data behind this figure represents around half of the police forces in England and Wales. The data isn’t available for the others, nor for police forces in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
The majority of resolved incidents (52%) end within eight hours, with 80% being resolved within 24 hours. This doesn’t include the small number of cases that are unresolved.
The UK Missing Persons Unit records that 1,514 children are long-term missing, which means they have been missing for longer than 28 days in England, Wales, and Scotland (data for Northern Ireland isn’t available) and remain unresolved. Cases can remain open for a significant amount of time.
The reality is that sadly there are about 50 child murders a year, nearly all of them caused by the child's parent or step-parent.
Although it is important to point out that children have to be street-smart and aware of Stranger-Danger the overwhelming number of sexual abuse cases against children involve someone with a familial connection.
There is obviously no room for complacency when it comes to the welfare of children, and conversely, there is no room for hysterical nonsense.
This group is what is called a digital cult. It operates differently to the way the cults we are familiar with, but there are some obvious similarities.
The people in them have a slightly superior attitude, in that they maintain they are better informed than their critics.
"Wake up, Sheeple!"
They question the motives and morality of those who question their assertions.
Your criticisms are an attempt to tear them away from their higher moral purpose.
Most cults are eager to recruit not the gullible, but the articulate with a high moral sense.
You don't get to know entirely what you are signing up to until you are in, very, very, deep.
They have their own internal language and morality.
Leaving their orbit is dangerous.
What goes on inside their Facebook groups.
I spent a little time inside their private FB group. This is the one that is supporting the SaveourChildren demo in Portsmouth on 10th October and is building for future demos in Liverpool and elsewhere, it has also built for protests in Leeds and London etc.
I had better warn people that some of the screenshots are upsetting and contain antisemitic and racist material, and other hate speech.
To avoid confusion, it's masthead was changed by them from Save Our Children to s.o,c.f.m. (Save Our Children From Monsters). They did this to pre-empt their possible expulsion from FB. This is due to Facebook removing other SOC pages. So there is a combination of both. They chose to change it to avoid removal.
Amongst the figures involved are some familiar ones for those who monitor fascist activity online. One of their main admins has Pie and Mash squad posted on his masthead and also has some association with the North West Infidels, an EDL breakaway. There is also the person who ran the March for England group. There is a clear far-right presence in the group which is understandable.
This post basically explains their world view. Where society is run by a cabal of the Royals, Rothschilds and Rockefellers and of course the Vatican. All the bogie figures are seen as "liberals".
COVID is seen as a hoax, "Plandemic", merely a form of social control.
Which is why they are so prominent on anti-mask demos.BLM of course is just a distraction caused by our secret rulers.
One World Government and New World Order will be familiar to observers of right-wing groups.
Also, it has to be said anyone who thinks the Rothschild family are big players in international high finance has not been out of the house since 1925. They are old money from the pre-war period. People who bang on about the Rothschilds do not tell us anything about the world, but they tell us plenty about themselves.
From RT
The founder of an online publication The Online, Joshua Topolsky, asked Musk: “Do you think it's in the interest of powerful people to A: support a free press that exposes their lies, or B: tear it down so their lies are easier to tell?”
Musk responded: “Who do you think *owns* the press? Hello.”"
Save Our Children posted this:
This clearly shows that they sign up to the old school antisemite view that the entire media is controlled by a group of powerful Jews.
Is anybody beginning to see a pattern here?
The one below is particularly loathsome. Ron Jeremy the porn star has been arraigned on charges of rape. Matt Young the most active admin on the page chose to share this. The posting from a far-right page feels it necessary to call him "Jewish Filth" and make a reference to him preying on gentile women. This is, of course, classic antisemitism, the claim that Jewish men are predatory towards gentile women and was a feature of Nazi propaganda, most notably the film Jew Suss in which the central Jewish character rapes Gentile women.
The misspelling I believe is not out of ignorance or artfulness but to confound FBs checkers.
Some EDL type Islamophobia.
This has been lifted from American sites, where drag queens reading stories in libraries is apparently a thing. However, it promotes the idea that LGBT rights are really a trojan horse for paedophiles.
It also clearly pushes the line that Trans Rights are a threat to children.
Some of their blood rituals/ Adrenochrome ramblings.
Another post which is clearly marked as suspect, by independent fact-checkers which libels Kamala Harris and Planned Parenthood, a respected organisation.
Matt Young, their admin making clear where his loyalties lie.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault%27s_Pendulum It reminsds me of this book
ReplyDeleteDavid